Outpatient Management of Epistaxis During COVID-19 to Reduce Inpatient Stay: A Quality Improvement Project.

Introduction In March 2020, new guidelines allowed patients with epistaxis to be discharged home with nasal packs in situ to reduce the risk of inpatient coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) transmission rates. Our objective is to review how successful these new guidelines have been and whether they could be safely maintained in future practice. Methods This was a retrospective data analysis at a local tertiary ENT referral hospital. The study group consisted of patients admitted with epistaxis over one year. The "Pack and Home" criteria pathway was implemented. We reviewed this pathway six months pre- (loop 1) and six months post- (loop 2) introduction. Primary outcome measures included compliance with the "Pack and Home" criteria and length of inpatient admissions. Results A total of 131 patients required nasal packing, with 72 patients (55%) in loop 1 and 59 patients (45%) in loop 2. In loop 1, all 72 patients (100%) were admitted for inpatient care. However, in loop 2, 21 patients (36%) were discharged home with nasal packs in situ and 59 patients (64%) were admitted. Of those discharged, two patients were represented after 48 hours with rebleeding. The average total length of inpatient stay in loop 1 was significantly higher at 45.7 hours and 29.6 hours in loop 2 (p<0.05). All discharged patients attended their outpatient appointment in under three days. Conclusion The "Pack and Home" criteria can successfully identify patients who are suited for an outpatient management pathway. This could reduce surgical inpatient stay and the way we manage epistaxis.

Outpatient Management of Epistaxis During COVID-19 to Reduce Inpatient Stay: A Quality Improvement Project

Introduction In March 2020, new guidelines allowed patients with epistaxis to be discharged home with nasal packs in situ to reduce the risk of inpatient coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) transmission rates. Our objective is to review how successful these new guidelines have been and whether they could be safely maintained in future practice. Methods This was a retrospective data analysis at a local tertiary ENT referral hospital. The study group consisted of patients admitted with epistaxis over one year. The “Pack and Home” criteria pathway was implemented. We reviewed this pathway six months pre- (loop 1) and six months post- (loop 2) introduction. Primary outcome measures included compliance with the “Pack and Home” criteria and length of inpatient admissions. Results A total of 131 patients required nasal packing, with 72 patients (55%) in loop 1 and 59 patients (45%) in loop 2. In loop 1, all 72 patients (100%) were admitted for inpatient care. However, in loop 2, 21 patients (36%) were discharged home with nasal packs in situ and 59 patients (64%) were admitted. Of those discharged, two patients were represented after 48 hours with rebleeding. The average total length of inpatient stay in loop 1 was significantly higher at 45.7 hours and 29.6 hours in loop 2 (p<0.05). All discharged patients attended their outpatient appointment in under three days. Conclusion The "Pack and Home" criteria can successfully identify patients who are suited for an outpatient management pathway. This could reduce surgical inpatient stay and the way we manage epistaxis.